<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rachel g. fain &#187; Soap Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rachelgfain.com/category/soap-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rachelgfain.com</link>
	<description>writer &#124; editor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The right to know</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelgfain.com/2010/02/13/the-right-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rachelgfain.com/2010/02/13/the-right-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Soap Box]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelgfain.com/?p=416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Olympics started with a tragic accident, and we watched Nodar Kumaritashvili die, over and over. NBC played those four seconds at every break, it seemed. I couldn&#8217;t watch it. Part of me wanted to, just to see, but I had to turn away and fast forward through it. Did you, like watching the proverbial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"><span style="color: #e89c04;">The Olympics started with a tragic accident, and we watched Nodar Kumaritashvili die, over and over. NBC played those four seconds at every break, it seemed. I couldn&#8217;t watch it. Part of me wanted to, just to see, but I had to turn away and fast forward through it. Did you, like watching the proverbial train wreck, find yourself glued to the screen? Did you stare at his body, tossed again and again off the track? Did you <em>want</em> to see it? Would you feel deprived if you couldn&#8217;t?</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">The people have a right to know. The press declares its freedom and gives us what we want. What they think we want. What we must want, since their goal is to draw the most eyeballs, generate ratings, ad sales, revenue. Anything that doesn&#8217;t interest us quickly disappears for lack of ratings, so we must want to see death, destruction, tragedy.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">But do we have a right not just to <em>know</em>, but also to <em>see</em>? To be shocked, horrified, exhilarated, entertained by the death of someone&#8217;s son, husband, father, brother, friend? When they switch on the TV, they see him, too &#8211; is that fair? Is it right? There are far more of us &#8211; the hungry public &#8211; than there are of them &#8211; the grieving loved ones &#8211; so majority rules, right?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">Is that it? Is the world run like a playground?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">I felt the same way about the photos from Abu Ghraib. These human beings were humiliated and degraded. Not only that, it was captured on film (or bits &#8211; whatever). Let&#8217;s compound their misery and this horrible mistake by showing the pictures to the <em>whole world</em>. Great idea!</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">A friend suggested that the media must show these things, or we would cry cover up. Fine. Let the journalists look. Let them be our eyes, our witness. And let them report. That&#8217;s their job, isn&#8217;t it? Let them tell us what they saw, share their shock and horror, and we&#8217;ll forgo our more prurient tendencies. Maybe that will help us to be a little more human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rachelgfain.com/2010/02/13/the-right-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Enough for your meal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.rachelgfain.com/2010/01/04/enough-for-your-meal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rachelgfain.com/2010/01/04/enough-for-your-meal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Soap Box]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rachelgfain.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;You&#8217;re not fat enough to be an American.&#8221; I heard this statement recently on the BBC&#8217;s &#8220;Top Gear.&#8221; And it was funny. Even the young, not-at-all-fat American woman laughed, albeit uncomfortably, when it was said to her. According to the World Health Organization, the US falls at #3 worldwide in percentage of obese adults, behind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;"><span style="color: #e89c04;">&#8220;You&#8217;re not fat enough to be an American.&#8221; I heard this statement recently on the BBC&#8217;s &#8220;Top Gear.&#8221; And it was funny. Even the young, not-at-all-fat American woman laughed, albeit uncomfortably, when it was said to her. According to the World Health Organization, the US falls at #3 worldwide in percentage of obese adults, behind the Pacific Island nations of American Samoa and Kiribati. Not that the Brits have all that much to celebrate &#8211; they&#8217;re at #10. There has been a lot of discussion in the last decade about why we&#8217;re getting fat and how to stop it. The first question seems pretty simple.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">You may have noticed a billboard for Coca-Cola with the tag line, &#8220;Enough for your meal.&#8221; It is touting the new twin pack of 50 ounce bottles of Coke, implying that previous packages have been inadequate. That&#8217;s right, those old 2-liter bottles do not hold enough for a single meal. When feeding your family, you need a full 100 ounces of Coca-Cola to be sure you don&#8217;t run out. <em>Really?</em></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">Now, I don&#8217;t even like soda, so this concept is completely alien to me, but EEW. How many people are at this &#8220;meal&#8221; for which 100 ounces is &#8220;enough&#8221;? Are we feeding octo-mom&#8217;s brood? God forbid someone should have to drink water, and whatever you do, don&#8217;t give those children milk. (Sorry, octo-mom, I&#8217;m sure you don&#8217;t pour cola down their gullets.)</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">As of the 2000 census, the average family had 3.14 members &#8211; up about a half point from the previous decade &#8211; so let&#8217;s say that families have grown slightly faster and presume that today the average family has 4 members. That&#8217;s 25 ounces, or just over 3 servings, of Coke for each person. The billboard shows two bottles of regular Coke, so we&#8217;ll use that in our example&#8230; According to Coca-Cola&#8217;s Website, that&#8217;s nearly 300 calories and 90 grams of carbs &#8211; presumably all from sugar.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 1em;">I know I&#8217;m not the only person flabbergasted by this campaign. I know this because I&#8217;ve marveled with my friends and seen others marveling, too. One woman even posted a picture to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/batgrl/4124007090/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.flickr.com/photos/batgrl/4124007090/?referer=');">Flickr</a>. So, I guess the only question left is, &#8220;How do we stop it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rachelgfain.com/2010/01/04/enough-for-your-meal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
